UK Proposes Midnight Social Media Curfew for Older Teens
· 4 min read ·
The UK government has announced plans for an overnight social media curfew targeting 16 and 17-year-olds, though teenagers would retain the ability to opt out by adjusting their account settings.
Under the proposed measures, platforms including Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube would be set to unavailable by default for this age group between midnight and 06:00. The government also intends to require that features described as "addictive," such as auto-play and infinite scroll, be disabled by default for these users.
Officials say the combination of the curfew and the feature restrictions will improve teenagers' sleep quality, academic focus, and family life. The plans build on a June announcement that under-16s in the UK would face a complete ban from a range of social media platforms.
Government Cites Trial Evidence
The proposals draw on government-commissioned trials conducted in family homes across the UK. Approximately 300 teenagers participated, with social apps either disabled entirely, blocked overnight between 21:00 and 07:00, or capped at one hour of use. A control group experienced no changes.
In a report published on Tuesday, the government highlighted the overnight curfew approach as producing the most significant sleep benefits. It also noted more engaging family evenings and a less burdensome setup for parents. The curfew was additionally identified as the most manageable option to enforce among the three tested.
"These findings show what parents have been telling us all along: when children spend less time on social media, the benefits are real," said Technology Secretary Liz Kendall. She described the measures as crucial for helping young people obtain adequate sleep, concentrate on their education, and spend meaningful time with family and friends.
Political and Expert Pushback
The proposals have drawn criticism from across the political spectrum. Laura Trott, the Conservative shadow education secretary, dismissed the plans as a "dog's dinner," questioning the logic of a curfew that users can simply switch off.
"Either they think 16 and 17-year-olds should be on social media or they don't, but curfews they can simply switch off won't achieve anything," Trott said.
Child safety organisations have also expressed reservations. Andy Burrows, chief executive of the Molly Rose Foundation, welcomed the measures for older teens but characterised them as "yet another piecemeal set of announcements" rather than the comprehensive safety plan he argued was needed. He added that Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer "leaves office having announced a social media ban without a plan," with his likely successor Andy Burnham set to "inherit a series of missed opportunities."
Professor Sonia Livingstone, an expert in children's digital rights at the London School of Economics, raised concerns about the potential impact on vulnerable young people. She distinguished between curbs on push notifications, which she supported, and broader access restrictions that could prevent children from reaching out to trusted sources for support during the night.
"If it's a curfew on companies using push notifications to wake someone up in the night, absolutely have a curfew," Prof Livingstone told the BBC. "But if it's a curfew that prevents a child in need of support or help or comfort reaching out to trusted sources in the middle of the night, I think that's quite harmful potentially."
AI Chatbot Safety and VPN Questions
Beyond the curfew, the government outlined additional measures focused on artificial intelligence chatbots. Under the proposals, providers would be required to introduce regular breaks for users under 18, part of a broader effort to help children engage with AI tools safely.
The government aims to present its new proposed measures to parliament by the end of 2026, with the intention that they take effect alongside the previously announced social media ban for under-16s next spring.
The UK's approach mirrors legislation enacted in Australia, where restrictions on under-16 social media access took effect in December. Australian platforms were forced to close teenage accounts and prevent new ones from being opened. However, those curbs have faced criticism for being ineffective, with many teenagers reporting they can still access supposedly banned sites.
Concerns about feasibility have also surfaced in the UK, particularly regarding age verification for under-16s. One area of focus had been the potential use of virtual private networks, or VPNs, to circumvent age checks. However, the government cited commissioned research on Tuesday indicating little evidence that significant numbers of children are using VPNs to bypass age restrictions.
Pete Etchells, professor of science communication at Bath Spa University, urged caution in interpreting the government's trial findings. He described the study as small and "one part of the puzzle in trying to understand how children and parents will navigate technology restrictions in a practical way."
As the UK moves forward with its regulatory framework for young people's online activity, the debate over how best to balance digital freedom with safety and wellbeing continues to divide policymakers, experts, and families alike. What do you think of these proposed measures? Share this article and join the conversation.
